In the Computer world, there is a term called Moore Moore Sandy  Bridge 
Intel’s main competitor, Advanced Micro Devices, is attempting to attack the Netbook market that was powered by Intel’s Atom Processors, with an APU (Accelerated Processing Unit). This is the combination of a processor and a graphics processor, the brains and eyes of a computer. This revolutionary product is set to be more efficient, and strike Intel across the bow. AMD has been losing money had it not been for the Anti-Trust violations of Intel that were paid to AMD. Intel has a wide advantage at the moment, and Intel is expected to maintain its performance advantage with Sandy  Bridge 
-S. Martin
-S. Martin
 
You omitted the part of Moore's Law of Technology that states that both the physical size and monetary cost of technology will halve annually. That is the main component of the Law, and therefore your claim that the Law will come to an end because the size of the chips is decreasing is flawed because this means that the main component of the Law is in fact occurring.
ReplyDelete-T. Taylor
This is true but the point is that the chips can only get so small. Thus performance will not be able to come as they did other Moore's Law. The advances will be either more expensive or happen slowly. thus moores law as we know it will either be altered or invalidated.
ReplyDeleteSince Moore's Law will not reach $0, nor will the area of the chips be too small to build - Moore's has finite application. For a complete understanding of AMD's cognitive leap return to those days of yesteryear: Look at the original logic cycle of vonNeuman and Eckert and today's Buss processing cycle. The future will always be doing 'something' differently. We are now in parallel processing cycles with the unitary chip. We will expand the I/O buss to integrate it with the processing cycle or something else entirely. I'm not an engineer; I'm a COBOL Programmer, so I just use the tools I'm given, but I also don't restrict my view of the horizon.
ReplyDeleteInteresting comment Old Scout, I'm not an engineer either. It seems as though companies are continually adding cores, threads, new features, and more efficiency to improve performance. It used to be more clockspeed but the megahertz myth debunked that. Others have found, that a solid-state disk circa 2010 provides more performance advantages over a hard drive circa 2010 than upgrading from a upper middle class processor from 2007 to one from 2010 for the average users and power users alike. (tomshardware) So performance increases dont just come from the processor, too. Granted SSDs are expensive per GB
ReplyDelete